In
Women's Interest
E-Mail by Marcia Bunney Bio/Address
"Rights do not have to be earned. Human rights, by definition, are ours by virtue of our humanity."
Ann Jones --- Next Time, She'll Be Dead
Amnesty International
Report
In the context of human rights,
the subject of United States Prison Reform has achieved considerable prominence, and with
good reason.
Earlier this year, Amnesty International released a report
entitled "United State of America: Rights for all. In conjunction with its
recognition of the 50th anniversary of The Universal Declaration of Human
Rights, adopted by the United Nations in December, 1948, Amnesty is urging the U.S. to
practice what it proselytizes, to examine and cease its double standard in taking
responsibility for human rights.
The release of Amnesty's report also serves to launch the
organization's first worldwide human rights campaign. This year--long effort will focus on
a host of concerns, including the mistreatment of prisoners, with particular attention to
the plight of women, juveniles and the mentally ill. Among the more egregious of the U.S.
human rights violations are the series of highly publicized "blood sport"
shooting deaths at Corcoran State Prison in California, and the continuing dismal standard
of medical care provided at two of the state's prison facilities housing women.
In fact, the State of California,
which operates the largest and most costly prison system in the world, has a great
deal to answer for in terms of human rights violations. The damage wrought by years of
prison expansion at the expense of medical care, education and other pro-social programs
and institutions across the board is severe, and not easily reversed. Any meaningful
solution must take into consideration the deeply entrenched nature of the social ills
which plague our communities, including joblessness, illiteracy, racism and
violence--particularly violence against women and children.
UNPRECEDENTED
RATE OF
INCARCERATION Of WOMEN
The past two decades have brought
unprecedented growth in women's rate of incarceration. Our nation's prisons are full, and
their population reflects a greater proportion of women--about 10 percent,
nationwide--than at any point in history. In California, for example, mid-1982 saw the
population of the state's sole all-female facility at slightly above 1,000. Sixteen years
later, that figure exceeds 10,000, reflecting a tenfold increase.
It has been generally recognized for
some time that the "war on drugs" has been the primary cause of this increase.
The past few years have brought an awareness that until women's substance abuse problems
are addressed, the rate of incarceration for females will continue to soar.
TREATMENT
OF WOMEN
In treating women, however, it is
vital to recognize that their core concerns often differ sharply from those of men.
Substance abuse recovery programs offered in prisons, as with the majority of such
programs on the outside, continue to be formulated using a male model. Feminist advocates,
including author Gloria Steinem, have expressed concern that the principles set forth in
these programs, which often parallel those of Alcoholics Anonymous and Narcotics
Anonymous, act to further impair women's self-esteem, and thus impede their healing
process. Additionally, treating substance abuse as an independent problem rather that a
symptom of dysfunction shifts the focus from other areas in need of attention, notable
literacy and job training/readiness.
The missing link is the prevalence of
abuse in the backgrounds of incarcerated women. Several studies have determined
that as many as 88 percent of women incarcerated today have suffered one or more forms of
abuse: emotional, physical, sexual. One study conducted in California concluded that women
prisoners as a group demonstrate a propensity to respond to the pain of abuse in their
lives by "self-medicating" with alcohol and/or drugs. Until incarcerated women
receive viable treatment at every level, including care designed to ameliorate the damage
inflicted by years of abuse, there is little chance that their lot will improve.
COMMISSION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
RESOLUTION
The international focus on
women's rights as a human rights question sharpened in March 1994, with the United Nations
Commission on Human Rights' appointment of a Special Rapporteur on the causes and
consequences of violence against women. The Commission has acknowledged the particular
vulnerability of women in its resolution 1996/49, which states in part:
The Commission notes that the Special Rapporteur has established procedures to seek information from government entities concerning specific cases of alleged violence, and supports the conclusions and recommendations of the Special Rapporteur regarding "the affirmative duty (of states) to promote and protect the human rights of women and (to) exercise due diligence to prevent violence against women, including violence against women in the family..."
The Commission further "calls on States:
The Commission also "requests all Governments to cooperate with and assist the Special Rapporteur in the performance of the tasks and duties mandated, to supply all information requested and respond to the Special Rapporteur's visits and communications."
US HYPOCRISY REGARDING HUMAN
RIGHTS
The lens of international
relations has now focused on U.S. hypocrisy regarding human rights, a development of
enormous significance to those of us who are concerned about the course of women's rights
advocacy. That we are a nation in denial is demonstrated by a stubborn resistance to the
truth of consequences resulting from our refusal to acknowledge and honor women's rights
as human rights.
It has been said that a nation may be judged by the manner
in which all citizens, including prisoners, are treated by their government. Bearing
this premise in mind, the U.S. record on women's issues as human rights concerns leaves
much to be desired--and ample room for innovative solutions to be sought and undertaken.
Interestingly, international censure of the U.S. record on
human rights within its own borders has coincided with conservative upsets in elections
across the country. In state after state, the voters have rejected candidates whose
approach to serious and complex socioeconomic problems has been simplistic, expensive and,
ultimately, ruinous: the politics of retribution, rather than
restoration.
It seems we are giving ourselves another chance--finally.