Disenfranchisement of felons
is racially discriminatory

E-Mail   by Stephen Fraley   Bio/Address

    The disenfranchisement that results from felony convictions has a discriminatory racial impact, affecting percent of African-Americans men. This represents 1.4 million people - 6 percent of the total disenfranchised population - according to the Sentencing Project and Human Rights Watch. The impact of disenfranchisement is heightened by the fact that only 4.6 million black men voted in 1996.
    Conspiracy theorists would see this as incontrovertible proof that the power elite is out to get the black man. Let us reserve the judgment , however, and consider the facts. I am an African-American prisoner, incarcerated for 18 years. I feel the personal weight of disenfranchisement. I am a nonentity with regard to the political process.
    This is the only democracy that denies so many people the right to vote due to felony convictions. In addition to losing the right to vote, felons also lose the right to serve on a jury or to hold public office. They suffer "civil death."
    Unlike some states, we can regain these rights in New York after completing parole. Since I have lifetime parole, I will never regain these rights.
    While 25 percent of the New York State population are minorities, we comprise 85 percent of the prisoners.
    Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall questioned "whether the state can demonstrate a compelling or rational policy interest in denying former felons the right to vote." He considered it counter-productive to rehabilitation.
    Many of us inside would relish the opportunity to participate in the political processes of the nation that we love, the society that we will return to. Maine, Massachusetts, Utah and Vermont do not disenfranchise convicted felons, but 10 states disenfranchise ex-felons for life: Alabama, Delaware, Florida, Iowa, Kentucky, Mississippi, Nevada, New Mexico, Virginia, and Wyoming.
    Complainants in New York dropped a prison voting-rights lawsuit in 1996 when former Attorney General Dennis Vacco blocked it in federal court.
    In support of restoring voting rights to parolees, Assemblyman Keith Wright, D-Manhattan, chairman of the Legislatures Black and Puerto Rican Caucus, said: "I think it is something that could help integrate our former prison population into mainstream society."
    The severity of sentencing policies today - i.e., three-strikes laws, mandatory minimums and truth-in-sentencing legislation - simply multiply the effect of disenfranchisement. Those policies swell the already overcrowded prison system, although crime rates have leveled off. There are currently 1.8 million people incarcerated in the United States.
    Many countries permit prisoners to vote: Germany, the Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Israel, Japan, Kenya, the Netherlands, Norway, Peru, Poland, Romania, Sweden and Zimbabwe. Although criminal disenfranchisement disregards international human rights, there is no evidence that the United States will consider repealing it in the foreseeable future.
    As with the drug epidemic that has been sweeping the country for the last 0 years, many policy-makers are unlikely to give this problem serious consideration as long as it affects primarily African-Americans. But it deserves immediate attention.
    Criminal disenfranchisement is a law that most people never think about, but should. This kind of policy seriously diminishes the right to vote, particularly among African-Americans, undermining 40 years of struggle and strife. It is frightening to see decades of voting-rights gains so easily swept aside. It gives me a distinct feeling of insecurity, and that is contrary to the goals of a democracy.

Hit Counter

Back