Scarlet Letter
By Willie Christopher Tucker
Since my release from a Georgia prison in 2006, I have worn a Scarlet Letter. Reminiscent of the protagonist, Hester Prynne, who wore an "A" on her clothing as punishment for adultery, I have worn the felonious "c" for convict. I have struggled virtually unassisted to find a real place in an unforgiving society. Furthermore, with a criminal history, I have been effectively locked out of mainstream American life and, I feel, purposely relegated to a socio-economic wasteland. This wasteland that I speak of is a place where not even the most basic human needs are met. It is a place where disparity is clearly defined and it is in itself the proverbial Jim Crow of our modem times. Similar to the past, the lines are clearly drawn and the ill-fated "Separate but Equal Doctrine" is even more obvious, paramount, and detrimental to the precept of redemption.
Analogous
to Hawthorne's exploration of the darker side of human nature, mine to, is a
never-ending saga with themes of guilt and genuine efforts of reconciliation.
However, in my tale, prisoners are released from incarceration, can't find
housing, can't find assistance and subsequently commit crimes and are returned
to prison; many simply because they can't find jobs. Since this pattern is not
new or unheard of, it stirs the rational mind to wonder about the deeper
implications. The most frightening of which being, is this the accepted norm?
Secondly, why are officials, who say to the media, that they are working to
create a brighter, safer community for all, allowed to neglect such a large and
needy segment of the population when the cameras stop rolling? Thirdly, why
isn't someone holding them accountable for their deception and their
indifference?
Gainful employment being one of the requirements of the parole directive, it would seem that assistance in this particular area would be a priority to officials. However, it has been my personal experience that this is not the case. Having been trained as a Certified Nurse Aide, at tax-payer's expense, while in the system, I felt that I had a real edge on the "ordinary" ex- convict slash Scarlet Letter bearer, and would be received as a professional by prospective employers. However, this was far from true. I must have been quite delusional. Because, very little, if anything was done to assist me in my theoretical constitutionally guaranteed "Pursuit of Happiness."
Though I am skilled in many areas and would make a superb employee, I am not given the opportunity. For instance, I recently went into the Georgia Department of Labor as a part of my job search. There, the State sponsors a program called Topp Stepp. Hypothetically, the program is supposed to assist ex-offenders find jobs that will hire individuals with criminal backgrounds. Topp Stepp has two dynamics: 1. The Federal Bonding Program (FBP), which offers fidelity bonding insurance protection to ex-felons through the Travelers Property Casualty Corporation; 2. The Work Opportunity Tax Credit (WOTC), which provides a federal tax credit to employers of up to $2,400 to employ ex-felons. The program starts inside the prisons as a required self-help initiative mandated by the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles. Once released, parolees are to follow-up with the GDOL where job referrals are made. As part of my first venture out into the world-of-work, I was given a referral to a warehouse near Atlanta's airport. I did all of the preparations and I was sure that I would get the job. I was skilled. I was well groomed. I was ready. However, the stars must have been in the wrong alignment. I had obviously walked into a small version of Fort Knox. The security there was immense and I didn't need a tingling spider-sense to tell me that I had crawled into the wrong web. Well, not to be undone, I decided to sever my ties, temporarily, with the GDOL.
On my next excursion, I walked into a Red Lobster restaurant. The atmosphere was cozy and I was feeling optimistic. I filled out the application and was directed to a little out-of-the-way table, near a window, and away from the aisles, where I was to meet my would-be interviewer. I opened up the discussion with my qualifications and how I would be beneficial to the company. Everything went well at first; I seemed to have won him over. Then came the time to discuss my criminal history; like most undesirable blind dates, it hit him like a ton of bricks and I was left to dine alone. Consequently, it seems my quest for some semblance of normalcy and perceived equality has been and will be laden with tons of ridicule. And, it is apparent that I will have to put myself in hundreds of humiliating circumstances, in order to feel the dignity others take for granted that is commonly associated with one, "earning his keep."
I am told to find a job by parole officials, but in reality, it is an almost impossible task, because C- bearers are scrutinized by means of the NCIC (criminal history inquiry) check. In this way, I am marginalized and disenfranchised to absolute nothingness. It is almost a feeling of being subhuman. And I am not alone; the problem is pervasive and systemic amongst released prisoners, particularly in this post 911 world, when everything is security driven. How is one to succeed if there is a culture created to assure his failure? What are the underlying motivations and incentives that fuel this insanity? And of course, who stands to profit from our failure to successfully reintegrate? More has to be done to truly assist those who wear the Scarlet Letter in our society. Oddly enough, the continually escalating crime rate is definitely correlated with the unemployment of felons. Yet, the ostracizing of felons that need jobs continues with no foreseeable end in sight. Since I am prone to conspiracy theories, I will leave you to ponder logical responses to the above questions.